Dr. Muhammad Zeshan Afzal

Prof. Dr. Didier Stricker

Dr. Alain Pagani

Keonna Cunningham

Dr. Oliver Wasenmüller

Dr. Gabriele Bleser

Dr. Bruno Mirbach

Dr. Jason Raphael Rambach

Dr. Bertram Taetz

Mhd Rashed Al Koutayni

Jilliam Maria Diaz Barros

Iuliia Brishtel

Mahdi Chamseddine

Steve Dias da Cruz

Ahmet Firintepe

Sophie Folawiyo

David Michael Fürst

Kamalveerkaur Garewal

Christiano Couto Gava

Leif Eric Goebel

Tewodros Amberbir Habtegebrial

Jigyasa Singh Katrolia

Andreas Kölsch

Onorina Kovalenko

Muhammad Jameel Nawaz Malik

Nareg Minaskan Karabid

Mohammad Minouei

Manthan Pancholi

Engr. Kumail Raza

Dr. Nadia Robertini

María Alejandra Sánchez Marín

Dr. Kripasindhu Sarkar

Alexander Schäfer

Pascal Schneider

Lukas Stefan Staecker

Dr. Vladislav Golyanik

Dr. Aditya Tewari

André Luiz Brandão

Mixed reality applications in urology: Requirements and future potential

Mixed reality applications in urology: Requirements and future potential
Gerd Reis, Mehmet Yilmaz, Jason Raphael Rambach, Alain Pagani, Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola, Arkadiusz Miernik, Paul Lesur, Nareg Minaskan Karabid
Elsevier (Hrsg.). Annals of Medicine and Surgery 66 Seiten 1-6 Elsevier 2021 .

Abstract:: Background: Mixed reality (MR), the computer-supported augmentation of a real environment with virtual elements, becomes ever more relevant in the medical domain, especially in urology, ranging from education and training over surgeries. We aimed to review existing MR technologies and their applications in urology. Methods: A non-systematic review of current literature was performed using the PubMed-Medline database using the medical subject headings (MeSH) term “mixed reality”, combined with one of the following terms: “virtual reality”, “augmented reality”, ‘’urology’’ and “augmented virtuality”. The relevant studies were utilized. Results: MR applications such as MR guided systems, immersive VR headsets, AR models, MR-simulated ureteroscopy and smart glasses have enormous potential in education, training and surgical interventions of urology. Medical students, urology residents and inexperienced urologists can gain experience thanks to MR technologies. MR applications are also used in patient education before interventions. Conclusions: For surgical support, the achievable accuracy is often not sufficient. The main challenges are the non-rigid nature of the genitourinary organs, intraoperative data acquisition, online and multimodal registration and calibration of devices. However, the progress made in recent years is tremendous in all respects and the gap is constantly shrinking.

Back to the overview